<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="http://pepace.synthasite.com/blog-post/category/blog-post.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title>blog-post</title>
        <description>blog-post</description>
        <link>http://pepace.synthasite.com/blog-post/category/blog-post.php</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:19:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Emitters that can not be seen:</title>
            <link>http://pepace.synthasite.com/blog-post/category/blog-post/emitters-that-can-not-be-seen-</link>
            <description>&lt;SPAN class=&quot;yui-tag-span yui-tag&quot; style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 14px&quot; tag=&quot;span&quot;&gt;The low probability of intercept emitter&amp;nbsp;is designed such that it can&amp;nbsp;not be intercepted by a noncooperative intercept receiver. The emitter's&amp;nbsp;processing gain (time bandwidth product) is&amp;nbsp;large and is much larger than the noncooperative intercept receiver's processing gain. The large processing gain of the emitter comes from coding the transmitted waveform with a code that is unknown to the intercept receiver.&amp;nbsp;In addition, a low power waveform transmission, an ultra low side lobe antenna and scan modulations that are confusing also contribute to a low probability of intercept emitter. These methods of LPI design are complex especially when they are combined into a single piece of hardware. Increased capability can also be achieved by networking two or more of these emitters together for a covert battlefield surveillance. This has a major impact of the waveforms that are used and the receiver signal processing used in each emitter. &lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:50:47 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
